Crystal Morphic States Jan. 23, 2024.

By Emily Conover

MAY 17, 2021 AT 3:00 PM

In an instant, the bomb obliterated everything.

The tower it sat on and the copper wires strung around it: vaporized. The desert sand below: melted.

In the aftermath of the first test of an atomic bomb, in July 1945, all this debris fused together, leaving the ground of the New Mexico test site coated with a glassy substance now called trinitite. High temperatures and pressures helped forge an unusual structure within one piece of trinitite, in a grain of the material just 10 micrometers across — a bit longer than a red blood cell.

That grain contains a rare form of matter called a quasicrystal, born the moment the nuclear age began, scientists report May 17 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Normal crystals are made of atoms locked in a lattice that repeats in a regular pattern. Quasicrystals have a structure that is orderly like a normal crystal but that doesn’t repeat. This means quasicrystals can have properties that are forbidden for normal crystals. First discovered in the lab in 1980s, quasicrystals also appear in nature in meteorites (SN: 12/8/16).

Penrose tilings (one shown) are an example of a structure that is ordered but does not repeat. Quasicrystals are a three-dimensional version of this idea.INDUCTIVELOAD/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS

The newly discovered quasicrystal from the New Mexico test site is the oldest one known that was made by humans.

Trinitite takes its moniker from the nuclear test, named Trinity, in which the material was created in abundance (SN: 4/8/21). “You can still buy lots of it on eBay,” says geophysicist Terry Wallace, a coauthor of the study and emeritus director of Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.

But, he notes, the trinitite the team studied was a rarer variety, called red trinitite. Most trinitite has a greenish tinge, but red trinitite contains copper, remnants of the wires that stretched from the ground to the bomb. Quasicrystals tend to be found in materials that have experienced a violent impact and usually involve metals. Red trinitite fit both criteria.

But first the team had to find some.

“I was asking around for months looking for red trinitite,” says theoretical physicist Paul Steinhardt of Princeton University. But Steinhardt, who is known for trekking to Siberia to seek out quasicrystals, wasn’t deterred (SN: 2/19/19). Eventually, mineralogist Luca Bindi of the University of Florence got some from an expert in trinitite, who began collaborating with the team. Then the painstaking work started, with Bindi “looking through every little microscopic speck” of the trinitite sample, says Steinhardt. Finally, Bindi extracted the tiny grain. By scattering X-rays through it, the researchers revealed that the material had a type of symmetry found only in quasicrystals. 

​

    Headlines and summaries of the latest Science News articles, delivered to your email inbox every Thursday.

Sign Up

The new quasicrystal, formed of silicon, copper, calcium and iron, is “brand new to science,” says mineralogist Chi Ma of Caltech, who was not involved with the study. “It’s a quite cool and exciting discovery,” he says.

Future searches for quasicrystals could examine other materials that experienced a punishing blow, such as impact craters or fulgurites, fused structures formed when lightning strikes soil (SN: 3/16/21).

The study shows that artifacts from the birth of the atomic age are still of scientific interest, says materials scientist Miriam Hiebert of the University of Maryland in College Park, who has analyzed materials from other pivotal moments in nuclear history (SN: 5/1/19). “Historic objects and materials are not just curiosities in collectors’ cabinets but can be of real scientific value,” she says.

Questions or comments on this article? E-mail us at feedback@sciencenews.org | Reprints FAQ

Editor's Note:

 

This story was updated May 18, 2021, to include Luca Bindi's role in the discovery of the quasicrystal.

A version of this article appears in the June 19, 2021 issue of Science News.

​

New study reveals surprising behavior of iron under extreme conditions

 (Download Image)

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory researchers applied nanosecond laser shock compression to iron at pressures up to 275 gigapascals — more than 2 million times atmospheric pressure — and used in situ picosecond x-ray diffraction to study the structure of the iron under these extreme conditions. Researchers said the resulting data improves understanding of materials science and provides insights into the internal dynamics of the Earth’s core, as well as the cores of other terrestrial exoplanets. Adobe stock image.

 

Iron is one of the world’s most abundant elements and a primary component of the Earth's core. Understanding the behavior of iron under extreme conditions, such as ultra-high pressures and temperatures, has implications for the science of geology and the Earth’s evolution.

In a study conducted by a team led by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. researchers combined lasers and X-ray diffraction methods to examine how different crystal structures of iron are related to each other and what happens when it melts at ultrahigh pressures and temperatures. The paper was published in the journal Physical Review B.

Using the Dynamic Compression Sector beamline at Argonne National Laboratory, researchers applied nanosecond laser shock compression to iron at pressures up to 275 gigapascals (GPa) — more than 2 million times atmospheric pressure — and used in situ picosecond X-ray diffraction to study the structure of the iron under these extreme conditions. Authors said the ability to gather this novel data on iron provides insights into materials science and the internal dynamics of Earth and other terrestrial exoplanets.

“The measurements we have made for this work are a result of the amazing contribution of hundreds of scientists at LLNL and elsewhere,” said lead author Saransh Soderlind. “The experiments reported in the paper are becoming more and more routine on many platforms; however, the timescale of the experiments — over a mere few nanoseconds —and the scale of the collaboration required to perform a single experiment boggles my mind. It is surprising to me that some of these experiments have worked so well that we have started making measurements, which finally let us unravel some deep questions that we've had about the formation of Earth.”

Earth’s core consists primarily of solid iron with some lighter elemental impurities, surrounded by a layer of mostly liquid iron. As the Earth cools, the core grows over time through recrystallization at the liquid-solid boundary between the outer and inner core. The process of recrystallization releases heat which contributes to the convection currents in the outer fluid core. This convective flow of liquid iron has long been thought to power the Earth's geodynamo — the process responsible for generating the Earth's magnetic field.

In the study, the team found that the contribution to the geodynamo energy budget from the heat release from recrystallization may be significantly smaller than previously thought. The findings suggest that outer core convection currents are driven more prominently from alternative sources, such as lower-mantle radiogenic heat generation and the buoyancy of light elements excluded from the solid during the recrystallization process.

“There’s very little data on the behavior of iron at these extreme pressures and temperatures, so our contribution is providing the experimental measurements that complement years of theoretical work and will help constrain the amount of heat released from iron as it melts,” said the study’s co-principal investigator and LLNL physicist Ray Smith. “There are many contributors that people have come up with for convection currents in the outer core that would power the geodynamo. Theory would say one thing, based on their understanding of iron, but the experiments in our case are presenting a different view — that the process of the heat released from recrystallization is less than the state-of-the-art theoretical calculations.”

Smith said the study is the first to gather liquid diffraction data on laser shock-compressed iron. Through their experiments, the team determined the highest-pressure structure and density of liquid iron, indicating that iron melts completely by 258 GPa and behaves as a “simple liquid” under extreme conditions. The melt pressures for the nanosecond shock experiments were consistent with gas gun shock experiments that last for microseconds, indicating that the melt transition occurs rapidly, researchers concluded.

Additionally, the team demonstrated the efficacy of the picosecond X-ray diffraction platform — also a first for this type of research — in investigating the liquid phase of iron under extreme conditions, from the beginning of the melt to the completion of melt. Using diffraction methods, the team aimed to pinpoint the precise mechanisms behind iron’s phase transformations, performing texture analysis as the atoms in the iron reorientated themselves from an ambient crystal structure to the high-pressure phase.

The researchers found that when iron is subjected to high pressures and temperatures, it undergoes a phase transition from its usual body-centered cubic (bcc) structure to a hexagonal close-packed (hcp) crystal structure — and as pressure increases, the hexagonal structure eventually melts into a liquid. The transition from bcc to hcp is “not sharp,” Soderlind said, and instead the two structures coexist over a range of pressures.

“Materials subjected to elevated pressures can respond by phase transforming to a lower-energy crystal structure with profound changes in mechanical and transport properties,” Soderlind said. “Scientists have studied these transitions through theory and experiments for over a century. The precise way the atomic motion occurs to bring about such a change is scientifically intriguing and provides stringent tests on our best models.”

Soderlind said characterizing iron’s liquid structure is invaluable for comparing to predictions from state-of-the-art theoretical models, such as quantum molecular dynamics simulations. Although researchers could not determine the exact mechanism behind the phase transition in this study, the work provided crucial details about the coexistence of different iron phases and latent heat of fusion at extreme pressures, as well as essential data for future identification, Soderlind said.

“In this paper, we tried to measure this precise mechanism using X-ray diffraction. While we could rule out many proposed mechanisms, we could only reduce it to three choices, all consistent with the data,” Soderlind said. “This was a significant step forward. The experiment also gave us clues to what we would need in future experiments to identify this mechanism uniquely.”

Since the composition of the core-mantle boundary is not pure iron, and instead includes nickel and other light elements, Soderlind explained, future research could involve studying a range of iron-nickel alloys to better understand the composition of the Earth's core.

The team has conducted a follow-up experiment with one composition of iron-nickel alloy and plans another involving two additional compositions, which should give the team a more accurate measure of the energy contribution due to core solidification, Soderlind said.

Additional co-authors on the paper include Richard Briggs, Martin Gorman, Lorin Benedict, Christine Wu, Sebastien Hamel, Amy Coleman, Federica Coppari, Christopher McGuire, Jon Eggert and Dayne Fratanduono of LLNL. Other contributors were Amalia Fernandez-Pañella of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and Melissa Sims and June Wicks of Johns Hopkins University.

Jan. 9, 2024

Jeremy Thomas​

Structural study of hcp and liquid iron under shock compression up to 275 GPa

The researchers found that when iron is subjected to high pressures and temperatures, it undergoes a phase transition from its usual body-centered cubic (bcc) structure to a hexagonal close-packed (hcp) crystal structure — and as pressure increases, the hexagonal structure eventually melts into a liquid. The transition from bcc to hcp is “not sharp,” Soderlind said, and instead the two structures coexist over a range of pressures.

“Materials subjected to elevated pressures can respond by phase transforming to a lower-energy crystal structure with profound changes in mechanical and transport properties,” Soderlind said. “Scientists have studied these transitions through theory and experiments for over a century. The precise way the atomic motion occurs to bring about such a change is scientifically intriguing and provides stringent tests on our best models.”

Soderlind said characterizing iron’s liquid structure is invaluable for comparing to predictions from state-of-the-art theoretical models, such as quantum molecular dynamics simulations. Although researchers could not determine the exact mechanism behind the phase transition in this study, the work provided crucial details about the coexistence of different iron phases and latent heat of fusion at extreme pressures, as well as essential data for future identification, Soderlind said.